Subscribe
Southwest Airlines At San Diego International Airport

Source: Kevin Carter / Getty


Plus-size passengers will have to pay more if they need an additional seat,
Southwest Airlines announced recently. This reverses a previous policy, “Customer of Size,” that allowed passengers to fly without further cost if they required the extra room.

“We are updating many policies as we prepare our operation, employees, and customers for assigned seating on January 27, 2026,” the airline told Newsweek. “To ensure space, we are communicating to customers who have previously used the extra-seat policy they should purchase it at booking.”

This decision reflects other changes at the airline. After years of allowing passengers any seat they wanted, Southwest will transition to assigned seating next year. Tickets for 2026 travel with the new policy have been on sale since July 29. Southwest also ended its “bags fly free” policy a few days later.

“Our employees are excited about the changes,” Southwest CEO Bob Jordan told the New York Times in July. “Because if you think about it, if in the open-seating world a family gets on and they can’t sit together, the flight attendant is having to police that in the cabin.

He added, Our open-seat boarding can cause a lot of pre-boards, and our agents are having to police that. You have people who paid for early boarding, and then we have more pre-boards than anybody else. So folks that paid for earlier boarding are going, ‘Well, wait, why?'”

Given commentary on their IG posts, customers are not as happy about Southwest’s policy changes.

The new restrictions on larger passengers reflect the company’s business overhaul which has overturned popular, customer-friendly policies with ones that better reflect bottom-line financial goals. Southwest was among the few airlines that accommodated plus-size travelers with a fee-free extra seat, either via a refund for a second seat, or the ability to purchase two for the price of one.

Now, a plus-size passenger who can’t fit between the armrests must pay for a second seat. They can still request a refund, but only if the flight is not sold out, the tickets are in the same fare class and the request is submitted within 90 days of the trip.

The official policy reads:  “Customers who encroach upon the neighboring seat(s) should proactively purchase the needed number of seats prior to travel to ensure the additional seat is available. The armrest is considered to be the definitive boundary between seats; you may review information about the width of passenger seats. In addition, Southwest may determine, in its sole discretion, that an additional seat is necessary for safety purposes. Southwest will refund the extra seat purchased upon request once travel is complete.”

Delta Airlines is now the only major U.S. based airline that doesn’t require plus-size passengers to purchase an additional seat in advance, but if flight personnel deem that they are taking up more space than thier seat allows, they may reassign them to a different seat or flight.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

You May Also Like

Girl receives flu shot at outdoor free clinic

This week in politics, the vibes are messy, alarming, and straight-up confusing. From late night TV being snatched off the air to vaccine policies getting hijacked, it’s giving “WTF is going on?” Let’s break down the headlines everyone’s talking about inside. First Amendment on the Chopping Block Jimmy Kimmel’s late night show has been pulled from ABC, and Stephen Colbert’s show? Cancelled completely. The official line is murky, but the bigger picture is loud. Free speech is being tested under the Trump administration. While Trump once said he’d “honor” the First Amendment, recent moves suggest he’s working off a remix version that only benefits him. Case in point? The Guardian reports his $15 billion lawsuit against The New York Times. A judge already tossed it out, saying Trump’s claims about “false content” violated federal rules. Still, the fact that these lawsuits and cancellations keep happening has people questioning the future of free expression in America. CDC Shake-Up Sparks Health Concerns Meanwhile, over at the CDC, things are getting political fast. Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has basically turned the agency upside down, firing all 17 members of the vaccine advisory committee and replacing them with appointees that include vaccine skeptics. On top of that, the CDC director is out, high-level staffers are resigning, and decisions about vaccine safety are suddenly more about politics than science. Public health leaders are calling this move dangerous, saying it dismantles independent oversight just when Americans need clarity most. According to California’s government website, they are one of the few states pushing back on the federal government’s stance. California, Washington, and Hawaii aren’t taking it lying down. The states have formed an alliance pushing back on the feds, promising to keep vaccine guidance rooted in science, safety, and transparency. Their health officers are reviewing guidelines from trusted medical groups like the AAP and ACOG to ensure communities still have access to clinically recommended vaccines. Trump & Xi Meet About US TikTok’s Next Chapter And then there’s TikTok. After years of “will they, won’t they?” drama, Trump announced that he and Chinese Premier Xi Jinping approved a deal for TikTok’s U.S. operations. According to BBC, the plan reportedly hands control to a group of U.S. investors, sidestepping a shutdown. Trump called the call with Xi “productive” on Truth Social, and even, teased a face-to-face meetup at the APEC summit in South Korea this fall. From free speech battles to vaccine wars and TikTok drama, this week in politics has us all asking the same thing: WTFGO?

Global Grind