Subscribe
Empty airplane seats in passenger cabin. Leather chairs row inside modern aircraft interior. Bright light from window during flight.
Source: szakalikus / Getty

Passengers on Delta Air Lines and United Airlines have sued both air carriers over being charged extra fees to purchase window seats on flights, but learning on boarding that their rows didn’t have windows at all. According to The Hill, there are reportedly over one million passengers who have filed these separate lawsuits, and the Greenbaum Olbrantz legal firm represents them.

The lawsuits claim that customers paid extra fees to obtain seats on Boeing 737, Boeing 757 and Airbus A321 planes that would normally be accompanied by windows, but didn’t have them due to the placement of electrical panels, air conditioning ducts or other mechanical components. They go on to allege that the carriers sold “every wall-adjacent seat as a ‘window’ seat,” with Delta charging $70 more to select a seat as opposed to an economy fare. For United passengers, they were charged $50 more and $100 on international flights.

“Had plaintiffs and the class members known that the seats they were purchasing (were) windowless, they would not have selected them – much less have paid extra,” said the lawsuit against Delta Air lines, which was filed in federal court in Brooklyn, New York. The United Airlines lawsuit was filed in a federal court in San Francisco, California. The documents contend that Delta and United do not inform passengers of these instances during the booking process, unlike others such as Alaska Airlines and American Airlines.

The Delta suit is led by Nicholas Meyer, who had an early August flight from LaGuardia Airport to Orange County, California, with a layover in Atlanta, and chose a window seat. But after he was seated, Meyer says he spent “the ensuing four-and-a-half hour flight next to a blank wall.”

Then there’s Aviva Copaken from the United lawsuit who suffered from claustrophobia and “enjoys a view while looking out the window of the airplane” so she purchased three window seats, only to find out none of them were near a window. According to ABC News, she received a refund for two of her seats but not a third.

“We’re seeking to hold United and Delta accountable for charging customers premiums for products that they didn’t deliver, and misrepresenting the nature of the products that they did deliver. United and Delta could easily implement the same disclosures,” said attorney Carter Greenbaum. The lawsuit is seeking a “refund of the extra fees” in addition to punitive damages. Both carriers have not publicly commented on the lawsuits.

In other airline news, see the reaction to Southwest Airlines now charging plus-size passengers an extra fee.

Southwest Airlines Is Now Making Plus-Size Passengers Buy Extra Seats
Southwest Airlines At San Diego International Airport
12 photos

You May Also Like

Girl receives flu shot at outdoor free clinic

This week in politics, the vibes are messy, alarming, and straight-up confusing. From late night TV being snatched off the air to vaccine policies getting hijacked, it’s giving “WTF is going on?” Let’s break down the headlines everyone’s talking about inside. First Amendment on the Chopping Block Jimmy Kimmel’s late night show has been pulled from ABC, and Stephen Colbert’s show? Cancelled completely. The official line is murky, but the bigger picture is loud. Free speech is being tested under the Trump administration. While Trump once said he’d “honor” the First Amendment, recent moves suggest he’s working off a remix version that only benefits him. Case in point? The Guardian reports his $15 billion lawsuit against The New York Times. A judge already tossed it out, saying Trump’s claims about “false content” violated federal rules. Still, the fact that these lawsuits and cancellations keep happening has people questioning the future of free expression in America. CDC Shake-Up Sparks Health Concerns Meanwhile, over at the CDC, things are getting political fast. Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. has basically turned the agency upside down, firing all 17 members of the vaccine advisory committee and replacing them with appointees that include vaccine skeptics. On top of that, the CDC director is out, high-level staffers are resigning, and decisions about vaccine safety are suddenly more about politics than science. Public health leaders are calling this move dangerous, saying it dismantles independent oversight just when Americans need clarity most. According to California’s government website, they are one of the few states pushing back on the federal government’s stance. California, Washington, and Hawaii aren’t taking it lying down. The states have formed an alliance pushing back on the feds, promising to keep vaccine guidance rooted in science, safety, and transparency. Their health officers are reviewing guidelines from trusted medical groups like the AAP and ACOG to ensure communities still have access to clinically recommended vaccines. Trump & Xi Meet About US TikTok’s Next Chapter And then there’s TikTok. After years of “will they, won’t they?” drama, Trump announced that he and Chinese Premier Xi Jinping approved a deal for TikTok’s U.S. operations. According to BBC, the plan reportedly hands control to a group of U.S. investors, sidestepping a shutdown. Trump called the call with Xi “productive” on Truth Social, and even, teased a face-to-face meetup at the APEC summit in South Korea this fall. From free speech battles to vaccine wars and TikTok drama, this week in politics has us all asking the same thing: WTFGO?

Global Grind